BeşparmakBlog: "The Under-Minister for Transport" interviewed (A spoof)

"The Under- Minister for Transport" interviewed concerning Roads and Footpaths.

'A spoof interview written in 2009 and set in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus'

Chris Green

Interviewer:

Ladies and Gentlemen, we are pleased to welcome the Deputy Assistant Minister for Public Works to our programme tonight.

Minister: Welcome to the programme and thank you for sparing us some of your valuable time.

M Not at all.

I. So, as Deputy Assistant Minister for Public Works, what do you have to say about the deplorable state of the footpaths in general in this area?

M.          We in the Roads Ministry, would actually, generally assess our paved footpath inventory as being classified as 'Tactile Paving'.

I.            'Tactile Paving': Hmmm how would you describe, 'Tactile Paving' ?

M.         In the case of Northern Cyprus ,'Tactile Paving' is so termed, because when you trip over on it, you really do feel it!

M. But in answer to your original question, I do agree that there is a great deal to be said about the footpaths, and indeed roads in this area and in the fullness of time after due deliberation, consultation and careful consideration, things will be said, I can assure you!

I. I see…….. but are you able to give our audience an early indication of what might or indeed could be said?

M. Early indications or leaks as espoused by the British Labour Party, are not something we at the ministry indulge in… well not usually, anyway!

I. Really, why is that?

M. Frankly, we rarely have notice of ‘early indications’ ourselves, but I can share with you the results of sterling work recently carried out by our sub-steering committee for planning!

I. Please do, we are all ears!

M. With regard to the footpaths we at the ministry recognize that in the past, developers have used the term `footpath` rather too literally.

I. What do you mean by that?

M. Well in as much as the term is written in the singular, so the developers built the footpaths in a like manner.

I. Ah, so what you mean is the paths are only wide enough for a single foot?

M. Of course, well spotted! But we are also conscious that when we build them wider they are predominantly occupied by parked cars and as we do not have many widened footpaths, cars are forced to use the Ottoparks [car-parks] when the footpaths become full and of course, this is an intolerable situation for the car drivers to be forced to bear!

I. But surely footpaths were designed to take foot traffic not vehicles?

M. Well people walk on them………..to retrieve their cars…well, they eventually retrieve them...

I. Goodness me, so have the sub- steering committee come up with any kind of solution or an outline of a solution?

M. They certainly have! We have our finger on the button here at the ministry you know!

I. Well, let us come back to your last comment later on, but pray, what is the solution being outlined?

M. Recognizing that some of the footpaths are too narrow – cars can’t park- and some not wide enough for cars to share with pedestrians, we are moving towards an advanced stage of the consideration process which maybe fast tracked towards the ‘preliminary proposal’ process leading, in the fullness of time, to a conclusion. (looks smug)

I. Which is, Minister?

M. We will widen the footpaths!

I. Really, how wide?

M. Full lane width. (smiles proudly)

I. Full lane width! What, both carriageways?

M. Of course!

I. But where will the traffic go?

M. Same as they do now.

I. Let me guess; on the footpaths?

M. Tabi: Of course!

I. And the pedestrians?

M. On the footpaths as well, and they would be well advised to do so, for reasons of safety!

I. So what you are saying is that motor vehicles and pedestrians are going to share the same pavement.

M. Yes; exactly as now but on a wider and greatly improved scale! You see all this is part of a far reaching scheme for a revolutionary ITS or Its!

I. Meaning?

M. Integrated Transport System.

I. So in this case, mingling pedestrians with motor vehicles is interpreted by the Ministry as ` Integrated`?

M. Yes and let me tell you it took quite some figuring out at the highest levels of the ministry typing pool (chokes) erm Think-Tank!

I. I cannot help thinking that this proposal will compromise public safety.

M. Well hang on, it hasn’t reached the dizzy heights of a’ proposal’ yet, but no, on the contrary we believe that statistically and on balance, safety will in fact improve.

I. How on earth do you work that out?

M. Under the present system pedestrians transit from one side of the carriageway to the other side by way of by way of concentrated killing zones.

I. Meaning Pedestrian Crossings?

M. Yes; a rather a quaint little colonial term isn’t it! We believe that by integrating pedestrians and cars there will be no need for these tiresome crossing points and we will remove them at an early stage of the construction process!

Furthermore we believe that `ITS Possible` - That was my idea as it was my turn to have one; an idea, that is! (smug, proud smile again)

I. Inspired I am sure! So are there any other moments of inspiration at the Ministry you might share with us?

M. Indeed there are!

In the unlikely event of this part of the world being dragged into the EU, ITS will have to be extended to encompass EU norms and transport is key. We, having a finger on the button, will carry out early experiments beginning in the ITS by forcing cars and scooters to begin driving on the left hand side. If, as we expect, this proves to be successful, lorries and coaches will follow suit after a trial period!

I. Of how long??

M. That will of course depend on EU directives, but probably a month or so.

I. But you haven’t mention Dolmus traffic. Where will they go?

M. As they do now, we wouldn’t wish to disrupt the smooth running of the Integrated Transport System.

I. As they do now; you mean on the footpaths?

M. Of course, Integrated: ITS Possible!

I. You will have white lines and other helpful road markings?

M. Whatever for? You don’t have white lines on footpaths and anyway, that would involve another idea and we are not due another of those for a year or so at least!

I. Ok, so to conclude, can I take you back to a remark you made on at least two occasions concerning having a `finger on the button` at the ministry. Whose is the finger?

M. We take very seriously the important role of having a finger on the button at all times, Friday afternoons and weekends excepting of course as you no doubt understand.

I. Of course!

M. Members of a specially selected team of dedicated button monitors share the role on what might loosely be described as a rota, but in practice is slightly more flexible.

I. Meaning?

M. It depends upon who of any of them is in the office, at any given time!

M. But recognizing our role as an employer in respect of career development, one of the typing pool is being fast track groomed as a button monitor, except on Mondays.

I. Why not Mondays?

M. She can’t do Mondays; she is never in on Mondays!

I. But is the button ever pressed?

M. Pressed!! [chokes and becomes animated] The ministry button pressed! Dearie me no, that… goodness me, oh dear the very thought of it! – no no, the ministry button is never pressed! That is unheard of , unprecedented.

Look, the ministry button needs a finger upon it, in order to monitor it, so as to prevent it being pressed which, were it to be so, costly implications might ensue such, for example, as a ‘highly trained’ road working team being scrambled to say, Fix a pot hole, which of course we don’t have here, we have Tactile Paving, so in order to prevent this, it is essential that the button is monitored to prevent the inadvertent pressing of the said button.

I. Very enlightening; but in the event of a true emergency which might otherwise imply that the button should be pressed but we now know that can never be, what happens?

M. Simple; we get the Turkish Protection Forces to do what is required, usually at their expense, and then do what we always do in such instances.

I. Which is what?

M. We blame the Greeks!

I. Deputy Assistant Minister, thank you very much.